Journal of Science and Research Innovations
__________________
ISSN : 2583-9004 (Online)

For Journal of Science and Research Innovations (JSRI) journal, all contributions are subjected to a thorough review process. Since only the reviewer knows who wrote the piece, this is a single-blind review procedure in which the writers are kept in the dark about who did the reviewing. Generally speaking, peer review works like this:

• JSRI editors assess all contributions for adherence to Pandit Shyamdulare Education and research institute journal criteria, including English composition, scientific values, and ethical issues.

• Once the referees’ reports are received, the editor will make the initial decision on the manuscript as Acceptance, Revision, or Rejection.

• After receiving a revision with explanations, the editor will decide on the paper with the referees. Acceptance is only granted when comprehensive reports establish the manuscript’s worth and contribution in the domains.

• JSRI provides a review report form (template) to streamline the procedure. The reviewer should focus on the manuscript’s scientific and presentation quality, and provide constructive feedback to improve the manuscript’s quality. This necessitates a quick, thorough, and comparative evaluation of the findings.

• JSRI takes publication malpractice and conflicts of interest very seriously. Everyone involved in the process must declare any potential conflicts of interest.

• Reviewers should treat the reviewing process as entirely confidential. Reviewers shall not exploit confidential information discovered during the review process before the manuscript is published.

• We at JSRI believe that an effective editorial procedure that yields in timely publication benefits both the authors and the scientific community.