A paragraph of text is here. Establishing ethical standards for all stakeholders involved in the publication process is essential (authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, societies, and publishers).The ethics statements Journal of Name are based on the COPE Code of Conduct principles available online.

Editor Responsibilities

1. Decisions on Accountability and Publication: The editor of a journal has final accountability for everything published in the journal as a result of their decisions. To make these conclusions for libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism, the editor may rely on editorial board or publisher policy. In some cases, the editor may consult with other editors or reviewers. It is the editor’s responsibility to be prepared to publish changes and explanations as needed.

2. Objectivity is essential. The editor should look beyond the author’s ethnic or racial background, as well as his or her sexual orientation or religious beliefs, when assessing manuscripts for intellectual merit. When analyzing a manuscript, the editor should also take the author’s nationality and political views into account (s).

3. Confidentiality: Reviewers and potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher should be the only ones to receive articles from the corresponding author. The editor and any other editorial staff members involved in the process should keep the information to themselves.

4. Process of peer evaluation: Conflicts of interest between the editor and any of the authors, companies, or institutions affiliated with the articles under review should be resolved with the assistance of another co-editor or associate editor.

Reviewer Responsibilities

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions: As a result of peer review and editorial discussions with the author, the article’s quality may be improved by the editor.

2. Promptness: The editor should be informed quickly if an invited referee feels unqualified to examine a manuscript’s research or knows that a timely evaluation is impossible.

3. Confidentiality: You must treat any manuscripts that you receive as if they were private and personal information about the author. If they are exhibited or discussed, they should only be done with the editor’s permission.

4. Acknowledgement of sources: Examinations of any relevant previously-published work that the authors were obligated to cite in their work should be carried out, and the results should be communicated to the authors as soon as possible. The source of every assertion that is based on a previously documented observation, deduction, or argument should be mentioned with the statement. As a result, it is vital to ensure that all references in the text are properly linked to all references referenced in the bibliography, as well as to the references in the text itself.

5. Conflicts of interest: As soon as a paper or work is submitted for review, authors, companies, or institutions associated with it should be alerted and deny the request so that alternate reviewers can be recruited. Unpublished material from a submitted article should not be used by reviewers for their own research without the permission of the authors. Rejected reviewers must adhere to the same code of conduct.

Duties of Authors

1. Reporting Standards: Authors who report on original research findings must include a thorough summary of the findings as well as a critical evaluation of their importance. The underlying data should be appropriately represented in the article. It is necessary to give content and references so that others can repeat the work. The review articles should be comprehensive and up to date, and they should be free of bias.

2. Originality and plagiarism: Their work should be original; if it relies on the work or words of others, it should be re-written and re-submitted, particularly those who had an impact on the nature of the work they are reporting, they should appropriately credit and cite individuals who contributed to the work in question. Plagiarism can manifest itself in a multitude of ways, all of which are unethical.

3. Authorship of the manuscript: Participants who have had a substantial impact on the study’s idea, design, implementation, or interpretation should be the only ones allowed to sign their names as authors. Co-authors should only be named if they made a major contribution to the project. An Acknowledgement section should be included to thank others who have helped in the research process.

4. Conflicts of interest: The authors/corresponding author (on behalf of all the authors) must disclose any conflicts of interest that could affect the manuscript’s results or interpretation.